Traders baffled as nearly £180k spent on staffing costs to manage three Walsall markets

Traders baffled as nearly £180k spent on staffing costs to manage three Walsall markets

  • 18.03.2025 06:19
  • expressandstar.com
  • Keywords: Willenhall Market, Walsall Council

Walsall Council spent £177k on staffing for three markets, with traders questioning the costs. The council faced financial losses at two markets and struggled to promote events effectively. A report highlighted poor management and challenges for new traders entering the markets.

Meta Services

Estimated market influence

Walsall Council

Negativesentiment_dissatisfied
Analyst rating: N/A

The council is facing financial strain due to high staffing costs of £177,030 annually for managing three markets. They also incurred losses at two markets in 2023/24.

Willenhall Market

Positivesentiment_satisfied
Analyst rating: N/A

The market generated a profit of £33.5k for the council in 2023/24, indicating successful management compared to other markets.

Context

Business Insights and Market Implications

  • Staffing Costs: Walsall Council spent £177,030 annually on staffing costs for managing three markets.
  • Market Performance:
    • One market generated a revenue of £33,500 in 2023/24.
    • Another market operated at a loss of £38,400, and the third at a significant loss of £89,300.
  • Market Curators Appointment: The council appointed Market Curators to review the markets at a cost of £22,090, funded by the Government’s Community Regeneration Partnership.
  • Traders Feedback:
    • Traders reported "poor management" and "no promotion of the event."
    • They highlighted that it was "very difficult for new traders to get onto the market."
    • All traders operate stalls at other markets, suggesting potential best practices could be adopted.
  • Council’s Promotional Efforts: The council launched a Facebook page to promote Willenhall Market and posts daily updates.
  • Lack of Clarity: Traders expressed confusion about what the staffing costs were being used for.

Competitive Dynamics and Strategic Considerations

  • The lack of promotion and poor management have likely contributed to the financial strain on the council.
  • The difficulty in attracting new traders suggests a need for improved market entry strategies.
  • Competitor markets (where the same traders operate) may offer insights into better management practices.

Long-Term Effects and Regulatory Impacts

  • The significant losses at two markets raise concerns about long-term financial sustainability.
  • Poor management could lead to further budget strain, potentially requiring regulatory intervention or strategic changes in market operations.