Ripple urges SEC to stick to statutes and leave new crypto rules to Congress

Ripple urges SEC to stick to statutes and leave new crypto rules to Congress

  • 22.03.2025 05:05
  • cryptobriefing.com
  • Keywords: Ripple, SEC

Ripple has urged the SEC to adhere to existing statutes and refrain from expanding its jurisdiction over cryptocurrency regulations, suggesting that such matters should be left to Congress. The company criticized the SEC's past application of the Howey test as distorted and called for clear market structure legislation.

Coinbase NewsCIIHYsentiment_dissatisfied

Estimated market influence

Ripple

Positivesentiment_satisfied
Analyst rating: N/A

Ripple is actively engaging with the SEC and advocating for Congress to set crypto regulations, which could positively influence their market position.

SEC

SEC

Negativesentiment_dissatisfied
Analyst rating:

The SEC's potential new regulations could negatively impact companies like Ripple if they are deemed securities.

Context

Analysis of Ripple's Letter to the SEC: Business Insights and Market Implications

Key Arguments and Facts

  • Ripple's Position: Ripple argues that the SEC should adhere to existing statutes and defer new cryptocurrency regulations to Congress. The company emphasizes that the SEC’s authority is limited to enforcing laws as defined by Congress, not expanding its regulatory scope unilaterally.

  • Criticism of Past SEC Actions:

    • Ripple criticizes the previous SEC administration's application of the Howey test, claiming it was "weaponized" and distorted to expand SEC jurisdiction.
    • The company highlights issues with how terms like "speculation" were misapplied and decentralization was used to alter asset status under securities laws.
  • Support for Existing Framework:

    • Ripple praises the SEC’s recent statement on meme coins as a model approach, noting its clear articulation based on existing law that meme coins fall outside federal securities laws.
    • Commissioner Hester Peirce also supports this stance, stating that many meme coins likely fall outside the SEC’s regulatory scope.
  • Yield-Generating Assets:

    • Ripple argues that returns generated algorithmically by protocols should not be considered securities, as they differ fundamentally from profits earned through third-party managerial efforts.
  • Regulatory Sandbox Proposals:

    • The company supports Commissioner Peirce’s regulatory sandbox proposals but suggests they should only be implemented after Congress establishes clear market structure legislation and regulatory oversight delegations.
  • Impact of SEC vs. Ripple Case:

    • Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse declared victory in the ongoing legal battle with the SEC, causing approximately $15 billion in losses for XRP holders.

Market Implications

  • Regulatory Clarity: The call for Congress to establish new crypto regulations could lead to more structured market rules, reducing regulatory uncertainty and potentially attracting more institutional investment.

  • Competitive Dynamics:

    • If the SEC refrains from expanding its jurisdiction, other cryptocurrency companies may face less regulatory scrutiny, creating a more level playing field.
    • Ripple’s stance positions it as a proponent of balanced regulation, which could enhance its reputation among stakeholders advocating for clear crypto rules.
  • Investor Behavior: The clarification of meme coins and yield-generating assets outside SEC jurisdiction could influence investor sentiment and trading strategies, potentially increasing market participation in these areas.

Industry-Wide Considerations

  • Congress’s Role: The ongoing dialogue between the crypto industry and Congress highlights the need for legislative action to define market structures and regulatory oversight for digital assets.

  • Regulatory Harmonization: A clear framework from Congress could align regulatory expectations across jurisdictions, facilitating cross-border transactions and fostering global market growth.

Strategic Considerations

  • Ripple’s Strategy:

    • By advocating for adherence to existing statutes, Ripple aims to protect its business model and the value of XRP.
    • The company’s emphasis on clear guidelines could help mitigate legal risks for other crypto firms, potentially strengthening its position in the industry.
  • Long-Term Effects:

    • A Congress-led regulatory framework could have lasting effects on market structure, innovation, and investor confidence in the cryptocurrency space.
    • The outcome of this regulatory debate will influence the trajectory of digital asset adoption and the competitive landscape.

Conclusion

Ripple’s letter underscores the critical need for regulatory clarity in the crypto industry. By advocating for Congress to establish new frameworks and urging the SEC to adhere to existing laws, Ripple is positioning itself as a key player in shaping the future of cryptocurrency regulation. The implications of this stance extend beyond Ripple, potentially influencing market dynamics, investor behavior, and the broader adoption of digital assets.