open_in_newOriginal article
Fears Grow Over Delay of UK AI Safety Bill to Appease Trump Camp

Fears Grow Over Delay of UK AI Safety Bill to Appease Trump Camp

  • 24.03.2025 18:00
  • techrepublic.com
  • Keywords: AI, Government

The UK delays its AI Safety Bill, possibly to appease U.S. demands. Critics warn this may harm innovation and economic growth.

Alphabet Reports

Estimated market influence

OpenAI

Positivesentiment_satisfied
Analyst rating: N/A

Mentioned as a company that has agreed to submit AI models for safety evaluations.

Google DeepMind

Positivesentiment_satisfied
Analyst rating: N/A

Same as OpenAI, part of the nine companies that agreed to safety testing.

Anthropic

Positivesentiment_satisfied
Analyst rating: N/A

Same as OpenAI and Google DeepMind, part of the nine companies that agreed to safety testing.

Context

Analysis of UK AI Safety Bill Delay: Business Insights and Market Implications

Overview

  • The UK government is delaying the AI Safety Bill, which mandates safety testing for AI technologies.
  • The delay is suspected to align with U.S. political interests, particularly opposition from the Trump camp.
  • Key stakeholders include major tech companies like OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic.

Political Influences

  • U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance criticized Europe’s “excessive regulation” of AI during a speech in February 2024.
  • The U.K. is reportedly delaying the bill to appease the Trump administration, according to anonymous Labour sources.
  • This shift reflects broader transatlantic tensions over regulatory approaches to AI.

Safety vs. Innovation

  • The delay signals a shift toward innovation-first policies in the UK.
  • Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s January 2024 strategy emphasizes AI innovation while minimizing mention of safety measures.
  • The UK’s AI oversight body was renamed, seen as a move away from risk-averse regulation.

Economic Implications

  • A Microsoft report found that delaying AI deployment by five years could cost the UK £15 billion annually.
  • Stricter regulations may deter major tech firms like Google and Meta from scaling operations in the UK.
  • The UK aims to position itself as one of the world’s top three AI powers, focusing on innovation incentives.

Competitive Dynamics

  • Europe is perceived as pro-regulation, while the U.S. (under Trump) opposes strict AI regulation.
  • The UK’s delay aligns with U.S. interests but risks losing ground to stricter regulatory frameworks in Europe.
  • The UK declined to sign a global AI sustainability agreement alongside the U.S.

Long-Term Effects

  • Delayed regulation may attract tech companies seeking less restrictive environments for AI development.
  • However, it could also undermine investor confidence if perceived as unstable or overly lenient.
  • The UK’s regulatory approach will impact its ability to compete globally in AI innovation and ethical governance.