Surge In Tesla Protests: 5 Teslas Damaged In ‘Targeted Attack’ In Las Vegas

Surge In Tesla Protests: 5 Teslas Damaged In ‘Targeted Attack’ In Las Vegas

  • 18.03.2025 18:36
  • forbes.com
  • Keywords: protest

Protesters targeting Tesla facilities have caused multiple incidents of vandalism and arson across the U.S., with investigations ongoing. The Justice Department is pursuing those involved, while some acts could be classified as domestic terrorism under federal law.

Tesla NewsTSLAsentiment_dissatisfied
open_in_newOriginal article

Estimated market influence

Tesla

Tesla

Negativesentiment_dissatisfied
Analyst rating: Neutral

Protests against Tesla CEO Elon Musk have led to multiple incidents of vandalism and arson targeting Tesla facilities and vehicles across the U.S. and internationally. These actions include damaging dealership property, setting vehicles on fire, and spray-painting graffiti, which has resulted in financial losses for Tesla and negative publicity impacting its market position. The protests are part of a broader movement against Musk's business practices and his role as CEO of DOGE.

Context

Analysis of Tesla Protests: Business Insights and Market Implications

Key Incidents

  • March 18: Five Teslas damaged in Las Vegas via arson and gunshots; "RESIST" painted on windows.
  • March 17: Two Cybertrucks set ablaze at Kansas City dealership suspected to be arson.
  • March 13: Over a dozen shots fired at Tesla dealership in Tigard, Oregon, causing damage to cars and windows.
  • March 12: Protesters from Just Stop Oil vandalized a Tesla Optimus robot in London, targeting Musk over job losses and climate concerns.
  • March 11: Three Teslas vandalized in Dedham, Massachusetts, with wheels damaged and spray paint used.
  • March 9: Four Cybertrucks damaged in Seattle fire; origin under investigation.
  • March 7: Man set three Tesla charging stations ablaze in South Carolina while wearing a shirt referencing Ukraine.
  • March 6: Seven shots fired at Tigard, Oregon, dealership, damaging three cars and windows.
  • March 3: Seven Tesla charging stations damaged by fires in Littleton, Massachusetts.
  • March 2: "No Musk" graffiti with swastika symbol found at Maryland dealership.
  • February 24: Colorado resident charged with vandalism at Loveland dealership; police found gasoline and incendiary materials.
  • February 19: AR-style rifle used to shatter windows at Salem, Oregon, dealership; suspect faces federal weapons charge.
  • February 11: Nelson spray-painted expletive on Loveland dealership windows.
  • February 7: Nelson accused of arson and graffiti at Loveland dealership; police found incendiary devices.
  • February 2: "Nazi" graffiti painted on Loveland dealership sign.
  • January 29: Molotov cocktail thrown at Cybertruck in Loveland dealership.
  • January 20: Molotov cocktails used to target Tesla vehicles in Salem, Oregon.

Regulatory and Legal Implications

  • Investigation: Attorney General Pam Bondi announced a Justice Department investigation into Tesla vandals, with one suspect facing up to 20 years in prison for throwing a Molotov cocktail.
  • Domestic Terrorism Angle: While no specific federal statute exists for domestic terrorism, suspects could be charged under broader criminal laws if their actions are deemed intended to coerce or disrupt government policies.

Business and Market Impact

  • Stock Volatility: Tesla stock dropped over 12% in late January, erasing $23 billion from Musk's net worth and marking its seventh-worst day in history.
  • Investor Sentiment: The series of attacks has raised concerns about investor confidence and the company’s ability to maintain stable operations amid growing hostility toward Musk.
  • Reputation Risk: The protests and vandalism have damaged Tesla’s brand image, particularly as they coincide with broader scrutiny of Musk’s business practices and political involvement.

Competitive Dynamics

  • Musk’s Response: Musk has accused billionaires like George Soros and Reid Hoffman of funding the protests but provided no evidence. His tweets defending Tesla and criticizing critics have further polarized opinions.
  • Potential Backlash: The attacks could lead to increased scrutiny from regulators and consumers, potentially impacting Tesla’s sales and market share.

Long-Term Effects

  • Security Costs: Tesla may face increased expenses for facility security and insurance due to the targeted nature of the attacks.
  • Global Impact: Similar protests have occurred internationally (e.g., Germany), suggesting a broader anti-Musk sentiment that could affect global operations.
  • Strategic Considerations: Musk’s juggling of multiple ventures (Tesla, SpaceX, X) while facing political and legal challenges may strain his ability to maintain operational focus.

Conclusion

The ongoing protests against Tesla and Elon Musk represent a significant reputational and financial risk for the company. While the direct business impact is currently localized, the broader implications for investor sentiment, brand reputation, and regulatory scrutiny could have long-term effects on Tesla’s growth and market position.