Google agrees to pay £28m in alleged discrimination case

Google agrees to pay £28m in alleged discrimination case

  • 21.03.2025 10:52
  • hrmagazine.co.uk
  • Keywords: Discrimination

Google agreed to pay $28 million to settle a discrimination lawsuit alleging unfair treatment of employees from Hispanic, Latino, Native American, and other ethnic backgrounds. The company denies wrongdoing but has reached a resolution with claimants. Experts emphasize the need for fair performance systems and transparency in addressing pay gaps.

Alphabet Reports

Estimated market influence

Google

Negativesentiment_dissatisfied
Analyst rating: N/A

Google agreed to pay $28 million in a discrimination case, impacting its financial standing and reputation.

Context

Analysis of Google Discrimination Settlement Case

Key Facts and Data Points

  • Settlement Amount: Google agreed to pay $28 million (£21.5 million) to settle the lawsuit.
  • Allegations: The case alleged that white and Asian employees received better pay and career opportunities compared to employees of other ethnic backgrounds.
  • Lawsuit Filing: The lawsuit was filed in 2021 by former employee Ana Cantu, who left Google in September 2021.
  • Legal Basis: The allegations were made under the California Equal Pay Act.
  • Google's Stance: The company denies the allegations but settled to avoid further legal proceedings.

Market Trends and Business Impact

  • Growing Trend of Discrimination Lawsuits: This case reflects a rising trend of companies facing legal actions for alleged discriminatory practices in pay and promotions.
  • Increased Scrutiny on Diversity and Inclusion (DEI) Practices: The settlement highlights the growing importance of fair hiring and promotion practices to avoid legal risks and maintain employee trust.

Competitive Dynamics

  • Rollback of DEI Policies: Google, along with Amazon and other tech companies, has recently scrapped diversity recruitment goals. This shift may signal a broader industry trend or a reaction to regulatory pressures.
  • Potential for Regulatory Changes: The UK government's commitment to introduce ethnicity pay gap reporting underscores the increasing regulatory focus on workplace equity.

Strategic Considerations

  • Enhanced Diversity Training: Organizations must invest in training managers and HR leaders to ensure fair performance management systems.
  • Proactive Pay Gap Analytics: Companies should adopt tools like those recommended by Melissa Blissett (Barnett Waddingham) to identify and mitigate pay gaps early.
  • Risk Management Integration: Ethnicity pay gap risks should be integrated into organizational risk management frameworks.

Long-Term Effects

  • Increased Focus on Transparency: The case may lead to greater transparency in pay structures and promotion processes across industries.
  • Potential for Class Actions: Similar lawsuits could increase, prompting companies to reassess their DEI strategies and compliance measures.

Regulatory Implications

  • Pending Regulations: The introduction of ethnicity pay gap reporting in the UK (as hinted by Labour's commitment) may influence global HR practices and policies.
  • Global Impact: While the lawsuit is specific to Google, it sets a precedent for other multinational companies operating across diverse markets.

Expert Insights

  • Binna Kandola: Emphasized the need for fair performance management systems and manager training to address biases in employee evaluations.
  • Melissa Blissett: Highlighted the importance of early preparation for ethnicity pay gap reporting, including alignment with business strategy and governance codes.