Trump official said 'buy Tesla' on TV—did it violate ethics laws?

Trump official said 'buy Tesla' on TV—did it violate ethics laws?

  • 17.03.2025 19:46
  • fox10phoenix.com
  • Keywords: Ethics Violation, Legal Action

A Trump-era official endorsed Tesla stock on TV, sparking ethics concerns. Experts say this likely violated federal laws禁止政府官员利用职务为私人公司背书，但 enforcement may be unlikely due to weakened oversight during the Trump administration.

Tesla ProductsTSLAsentiment_satisfied
open_in_newOriginal article

Estimated market influence

Tesla

Tesla

Positivesentiment_satisfied
Analyst rating: Neutral

Lutnick's endorsement could potentially boost Tesla's stock and public perception.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick

Negativesentiment_dissatisfied
Analyst rating: N/A

His actions may lead to legal consequences affecting his role.

Context

Analysis of Trump Official Endorsing Tesla on TV: Ethical and Legal Implications

Key Incident

  • Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick endorsed Tesla stock on live television, sparking ethical concerns.

Legal Framework

  • 1989 Ethics Law: Prohibits federal employees from using public office for private gain, including product endorsements.
  • Exemptions: Presidents are exempt, but other officials like Lutnick are not.

Known Facts

  • Endorsement Violation: Experts agree Lutnick's comment likely violated ethics rules by endorsing Tesla.
  • No Formal Action: As of Friday, no public action or investigation has been initiated.

Past Precedents

  • Kellyanne Conway (2017): Rebuked for promoting Ivanka products; OGE responded swiftly.
  • Current Context: Ethics oversight weakened under Trump, with key officials removed.

Expert Opinions

  • Richard Painter: Notes a deterioration in ethics standards.
  • Kedric Payne: Warns of potential corruption if no consequences.

Future Considerations

  • Campaign Legal Center: Called for investigation; OGE and Commerce Department have not responded.
  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren's Call: Seeks inquiry into Musk's White House involvement.

Conclusion

The incident highlights a potential ethical breach with uncertain consequences, reflecting broader concerns about ethics enforcement in the Trump administration.