Default image

r/assholedesign on Reddit: Verizon filter thinks bait and switch is a bad word :(

  • 01.06.2025 07:16
  • reddit.com
  • Keywords: AI, Startup, Market Growth

A Reddit post about Verizon's bait-and-switch tactic was removed by moderators for being off-topic. The user explained that Verizon changed its perk without clear communication, making users pay more for Disney+ and Hulu.

Verizon newsVZsentiment_dissatisfiedDISsentiment_dissatisfied

Estimated market influence

Verizon

Verizon

Negativesentiment_dissatisfied
Analyst rating: Buy

Mentioned in the context of a subreddit post removal, not directly related to any financial or market impact

Disney+

Disney+

Negativesentiment_dissatisfied
Analyst rating: Buy

Used in the context of a bait and switch strategy, where users were charged more for fewer benefits

Hulu

Negativesentiment_dissatisfied
Analyst rating: N/A

Used in the context of a bait and switch strategy, where users were charged more for fewer benefits

Context

Business Insights and Market Implications Analysis

Key Facts and Data Points

  • Bait and Switch Complaint: Users are frustrated with Verizon's service changes, particularly the removal of ad-free Hulu and Disney+ perk. Previously priced at $10/month, it now costs $15/month for grandfathered users.
  • Subreddit Removal: The post was removed from r/assholedesign due to its off-topic nature, highlighting the subreddit's focus on "asshole design" rather than customer service complaints.
  • Regex Filter Issue: The subreddit's filter uses a regex pattern to remove posts containing "bait and switch," which is perceived as an asshole design tactic to suppress negative feedback.

Market Trends and Business Impact

  • Customer Trust Issues: The bait and switch tactic risks damaging customer trust, potentially leading to churn as users seek alternative providers.
  • Reputation Risk: Public perception of Verizon could be harmed, affecting brand loyalty and customer acquisition efforts.
  • Competitive Dynamics: Competitors may capitalize on Verizon's missteps by offering clearer service terms and better customer experiences.

Strategic Considerations

  • Transparency in Pricing: Companies must ensure clear communication of service changes to avoid customer backlash.
  • Customer Feedback Management: Suppressing negative feedback can backfire, leading to increased scrutiny and reputational damage.

Long-Term Effects

  • Regulatory Scrutiny: Misleading practices may attract regulatory attention, leading to potential fines or required policy changes.
  • Customer Advocacy: Increased focus on consumer rights could push companies towards more transparent business practices.

Conclusion

Verizon's approach raises concerns about customer trust and transparency. The incident underscores the importance of clear communication in business practices to avoid reputational risks and maintain customer satisfaction. Competitors should monitor such developments to enhance their own service offerings and customer relations strategies.