World’s richest man Elon Musk was lowest-paid S&P CEO in 2024, he responds, ‘despite increasing…’

World’s richest man Elon Musk was lowest-paid S&P CEO in 2024, he responds, ‘despite increasing…’

  • 03.06.2025 09:18
  • financialexpress.com
  • Keywords: Market Growth, Revenue Drop, CEO Performance, Stock Award

Elon Musk, despite being the world's richest man, earned $0 from Tesla in 2024 as his 2018 compensation package was rejected. He responded, "Zero for seven years, despite increasing the value of the company > 2000%."

Tesla ReportsTSLAsentiment_satisfiedSPGIsentiment_neutralAXONsentiment_neutral

Estimated market influence

Tesla

Tesla

Positivesentiment_satisfied
Analyst rating: Neutral

Elon Musk's zero compensation despite increasing company value >2000%

S&P

S&P

Neutralsentiment_neutral
Analyst rating: Strong buy

Elon Musk was the lowest-paid CEO in S&P 500

Johnson Associates

Neutralsentiment_neutral
Analyst rating: N/A

Pay-consulting firm providing advice on compensating Musk

Axon

Axon

Neutralsentiment_neutral
Analyst rating: Buy

Rick Smith's company, top-paid CEO last year with $165 million pay package

WSJ

Neutralsentiment_neutral
Analyst rating: N/A

Reported on Tesla's zero compensation for Elon Musk and Axon's CEO pay package

Barrons

Neutralsentiment_neutral
Analyst rating: N/A

Reported on Tesla's stock award pay package

Context

Analysis and Summary: Elon Musk's Low-Payment Status as S&P CEO in 2024

Key Facts and Data Points:

  • Elon Musk's Compensation:
    • Received $0 in compensation from Tesla for the second year in a row.
    • His compensation package, approved by shareholders in 2018, was worth $56 billion.
  • Regulatory Rejection:
    • The 2018 stock award package was rejected by the court twice, leaving Musk with no payout from Tesla.
  • Market Context:
    • Tesla's business is currently struggling, prompting the company to consider a new compensation plan for Musk.
    • Other S&P 500 CEOs, like Axon's Rick Smith, received $165 million in compensation, the highest last year.
  • Musk's Response:
    • Musk commented on X: "Zero for seven years, despite increasing the value of the company > 2000%."
  • Expert Opinions:
    • Alan Johnson, managing director of Johnson Associates: "There’s no point in putting out millions when for him that would be irrelevant. It would be a lot of billions."
    • Johnson suggested simplifying Musk's compensation structure to recognize the company's massive value growth.

Business Insights and Market Implications:

  • Competitive Dynamics:

    • Musk's $0 compensation highlights a unique approach to executive pay, contrasting with traditional CEO pay packages (e.g., Smith's $165 million).
    • The focus on long-term value creation over short-term metrics aligns with Musk's vision but raises questions about investor confidence.
  • Strategic Considerations:

    • Tesla's struggle to deliver on performance targets tied to Musk's compensation plan underscores the risks of complex executive pay structures.
    • The company may need to balance regulatory compliance with Musk's demand for performance-based incentives.
  • Regulatory and Long-Term Effects:

    • The court's rejection of Musk's compensation package reflects growing regulatory scrutiny on executive pay in the S&P 500.
    • The long-term impact of Musk's zero compensation could influence investor perceptions of Tesla's leadership and future growth.
  • Market Trends:

    • The shift toward performance-based compensation is reshaping executive pay dynamics in the automotive and tech industries.
    • Companies may adopt simpler, more transparent compensation models to avoid legal challenges and align with shareholder expectations.

Conclusion:

Musk's $0 compensation as the lowest-paid S&P CEO underscores a unique approach to executive pay, emphasizing long-term value creation over short-term gains. However, the regulatory challenges and shareholder concerns highlight the need for Tesla to reevaluate its compensation strategy. The broader market implications suggest a shift toward more performance-based and simplified executive pay packages, influenced by regulatory trends and investor expectations.